In spite of the popularity of such a view, even on the surface of things, this view is highly questionable. If we just step outside and take a look around, we can easily see that there is little evidence for the idea that God does not punish sin. Indeed, if we examine the evidence around us, we might conclude that God does not show mercy at all. What we observe is that people die and die terrible deaths. Young and old, rich and poor, male and female, they are all subject to the miseries of this world and the dread end of death. Martin Luther spoke eloquently on this point:
All the creatures are against us, prepared and armed to bring about, if possible, our destruction. How many are those whom fire and water destroy? How much peril threatens us from wild and venomous beasts, which harm not only our bodies but also our food, intended for our nourishment? Not to mention that we ourselves fall upon each other and murder each other, just as if there were not enough pestilence and other calamities to threaten us…What are thorns, thistles, water, fire caterpillars, flies, fleas, lice, bugs, etc. what are all these, jointly and severally, but messengers which preach to us of sin and of the wrath of God? Therefore, though we know better and our eyes see it, we are living in a more than Egyptian darkness. Though all creatures ever remind us of the wrath of God, so that we cannot avoid seeing it, yet we do not pay any attention to it (cited in Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, 1:536-537).
Why is that we are so blind that we do not see it? Martin Luther answered, “[We] love this earthly life and cling to it as our only delight” (Ibid.). In other words, we don’t see the wrath of God all around us because we are willfully blind.
We tend to want to ignore God’s wrath against sin, and our culture continually reinforces this belief. Though our culture does not want to see the evidence of God’s wrath, not all cultures have been equally blind. Many other cultures have believed that God is a God of wrath and tried to placate him with all sorts of sacrifices and good deeds. Timothy Keller in his recent book, Reason for God, recounts a conversation that he had with a woman who was offended with the idea of a God of wrath. He responded, “Why aren’t you offended by the idea of a forgiving God?” He then went on to tell here that many cultures were offended by the idea of such a God. He then said, “Why, I concluded, should Western cultural sensibilities be the final court in which to judge whether Christianity is valid? I asked the woman gently whether she thought her culture superior to non-Western ones.” Many other cultures have drawn a sounder conclusion from the phenomena of death and suffering than we have.
Of course, many people will respond by saying that the Bible teaches us that God is a loving God who forgives sin. This is true. However, if we are going to take the Bible as a source for knowledge about God, then we cannot simply arbitrarily decide what we will and will not take from the Bible. The Bible also teaches that God is a just God who hates and punishes sin. If we cannot believe the Bible when it speaks of God’s wrath against sin, then why should we believe it when it speaks about God’s love?
But does the Bible really teach that God is a God who punishes sin? Even a cursory reading of Scripture can teach us this. Consider three classes of Scripture text that teach this. First, there are those Scripture passages that teach that sin brings punishment. “The wages of sin is death” (Rom. 6:23). “Cursed is anyone who does not continue in all the things that are written in the book of the law to do them” (Dt. 27:26, cf. Gal. 3:10). The Bible teaches that breaking God’s law brings the punishment of eternal death.
Second, there are texts that speak of God’s anger against sin. “You are of purer eyes than to behold evil, and cannot look on wickedness” (Hab. 1:13). “He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him” (Jn. 3:36). “Now out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God” (Rev. 19:15). “God is angry with the wicked every day” (Ps. 7:11). These texts could be multiplied many times over.
Third, there are those texts that state explicitly that God will judge and punish sin and will not clear the guilty. “God is jealous, and the LORD avenges; the LORD avenges and is furious. The LORD will take vengeance on His adversaries, and He reserves wrath for His enemies; the LORD is slow to anger and great in power, and will not at all acquit the wicked” (Nah. 1:2-3). Ex. 34:7 declares that God is a God who “by no means clearing the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children’s children to the third and the fourth generation” (Ex. 34:7). Thus, God will not simply pass over the sins we have committed.
From all these verses, we might think that God is not merciful at all. We might think that we are all doomed. If this is the type of God that He is, how can anyone of us have hope? Isn’t God also a good God? Wilhelmus a Brakel responded to that point long ago. “You have heard that God is gracious, which is true. You are guilty, however, of distorting the essential meaning of the grace of God by interpreting it to refer to remission of sin and absolution apart from satisfaction. Such, however, is not grace” (emphasis mine, The Christian’s Reasonable Service, 1:129). What Brakel means is that God always punishes our sins. We either receive the punishment ourselves, or Christ takes it for us. God is a just God, and He never simply forgives sin. The only reason that He forgives sin is because His justice has been satisfied by the death of Christ.
The conclusion that we should draw from all this is that the only way that we can avoid the punishment of sin is by entrusting ourselves to Jesus Christ. The Bible is plain. Either you go to Jesus admitting your sin and seeking His grace and death to cover your sin, or you will bear the punishment of your sin to all eternity. “He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned” (Mk. 16:16). God is a God of wrath. We must not let our culture or sentiments blind us to that reality. The only way that we can escape God’s wrath is through Jesus Christ who delivers us from the day of God’s wrath (1 Thess. 1:10).

11 comments:
Justice requires a punishment proportional to the sin.
While punishment in hell is eternal in every instance, it varies in intensity in proportion to the gravity and number of sins the damned soul is guilty of.
Incidentally, two year olds, lacking the faculty of reason, are not culpable for personal sins.
Eternity in hell for all rapists... In fact, some sins are so heinous they shouldn't be forgiven... God has no right to forgive someone for shoving their d$%* up a child's a$s.
While your particular abhorrence for these sins is commendable, it is unjust of you to deny God His right to forgive any sinner who repents. Who are you to tell God which sins He can and can't forgive? On what basis do you deny him this right aside from your own vindictive passions?
Jesus' death doesn't let people off the hook. Rather it allows believers to go to heaven after burning in hell for their sins, rather than ceasing to exist... nobody gets off scott free to frolic in heaven without punishment.
I believe the word and the concept you are looking for is "Purgatory." Hell involves, not only the application of painful fire, but total alienation from God. A believer who is undergoing expiatory punishments in anticipation for entering heaven is not totally alienated from God, and hence is not in Hell.
Anyone is welcome to post on my blog. However, comments must be clean and respectful. I will always endeavor to respond in like manner.
Wes,
I point to these verses as my yes and amen to your article:::>
Psa 86:1 A Prayer of David. Incline your ear, O LORD, and answer me, for I am poor and needy.
Psa 86:2 Preserve my life, for I am godly; save your servant, who trusts in you--you are my God.
Psa 86:3 Be gracious to me, O Lord, for to you do I cry all the day.
Psa 86:4 Gladden the soul of your servant, for to you, O Lord, do I lift up my soul.
Psa 86:5 For you, O Lord, are good and forgiving, abounding in steadfast love to all who call upon you.
Psa 86:6 Give ear, O LORD, to my prayer; listen to my plea for grace.
Psa 86:7 In the day of my trouble I call upon you, for you answer me.
Psa 86:8 There is none like you among the gods, O Lord, nor are there any works like yours.
Psa 86:9 All the nations you have made shall come and worship before you, O Lord, and shall glorify your name.
Psa 86:10 For you are great and do wondrous things; you alone are God.
Psa 86:11 Teach me your way, O LORD, that I may walk in your truth; unite my heart to fear your name.
Psa 86:12 I give thanks to you, O Lord my God, with my whole heart, and I will glorify your name forever.
Psa 86:13 For great is your steadfast love toward me; you have delivered my soul from the depths of Sheol.
Psa 86:14 O God, insolent men have risen up against me; a band of ruthless men seeks my life, and they do not set you before them.
Psa 86:15 But you, O Lord, are a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness.
Psa 86:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me; give your strength to your servant, and save the son of your maidservant.
Psa 86:17 Show me a sign of your favor, that those who hate me may see and be put to shame because you, LORD, have helped me and comforted me.
Wes,
Your post is very timely. The idea of God's wrath and punishment of sin is largely lost today. Even in the Church! I've been reading Emerging Churches by Gibbs and Bolger and I keep coming across lines like "Why does the goodnews have to sound like bad news?" You'd think that they'd realize that the good news makes no sense without the bad news. In fact the gospel doesn't make any sense unless we can communicate the bad news effectively.
At first glance what you are saying seems logical and biblical. However, the gospel is scandalous and I believe you've missed the scandal. If you look at 2 Cor 5:19 you will see that God was in Jesus reconciling the whole world to Himself, not counting their sins against them. In other words Jesus paid the penalty for the worlds sins when He received the full wrath of God upon Himself in place of the world (not just the Church). I believe the judgement to come is not a judgement of sins plural but rather the sin singular of unbelief. Why will judgement come on people? Certainly not because of their sins (which are just the symptoms of unbelief) but because of their sin of unbelief (which is the root cause of sins plural). God is going to pour out His wrath on the sons of unbelief.
Jesus defines sin when describing the ministry of the Holy Spirit in John 16 as "because they do not believe in Me". It goes about 100 layers deeper than this but rest assured God will punish sin but just not the sin that you are describing. It is a thing called "double jeopardy". God can not punish the same sin twice. If He can than He would be unjust and we know that He is not unjust but just. Therefore He can not punish sins again because Jesus was punished for our sins when they were imputed to Him.
Mr. Lacey,
1. Even if your position is correct, my point is still valid. God either punishes sin in you or in another. Your point is simply that He has already punished the sin of everyone in Christ and that therefore no one should expect to have to pay for any of the sins that he commits except unbelief.
2. The problem with your view is that if the text means that God does not impute to any human being any sin at all, then why not also the sin of unbelief? Unbelief is a sin or trespass. God does not impute their trespasses. Ergo, He does not impute to them unbelief.
3. However, I think the reasoning is wrong because whenever we read of what Christ accomplished we always need to read "through faith" as being the condition as in Rom. 3:25, "whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood through faith..." Similarly, Rom. 3:22, "Even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe..." That is why Paul mentions immediately after the fact that God has committed to them the ministry of reconciliation because we are only actually reconciled to God when we are converted and believe on Christ, accepting Him as our Surety and propitiation.
4. The Bible seems to contradict your conclusion. "Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God is coming upon the sons of disobedience" (Eph. 5:6, cf. Col. 3:6, Rom. 1:18).
Thank you for your writing. I agaree with you. If one gets to know God by reading the Holy Bible, Old and New Testament, one cannot say that God does not punish. The guilt of our sins are washed away, and the punishment for sins may be paid for by Christs' suffering and death, as well as by His mystical Body, the Church, we, the baptized, united with Christ, we pay for our own sins, and those of others. Punishment has redeeming value. It also disciplines us. It cleanses us.
Please don't hear what I didn't say. I didn't say that we received His righteousness without believing as you suggested. What I did say is that God has already punished all sin for all time in His Son who became sin for us. The only sin Christ couldn't pay for is the "sin" of unbelief. It is the sin that will take unbelievers to an eternity without God.
Wes to equate the sin of unbelief with other sins is to make a critical error in judgement. Either Christ became sin for us or He didn't. You choose. If He did then God's wrath was satisfied 2000 years ago. If He didn't then we are all in BIG trouble.
There are only 2 types of righteousness. Imputed righteousness of Christ to us by faith or unrighteousness which is all other ways to merit favor with God.
The error also that is happening here Wes is when you have an Old Covenant mindset and are not "rightly dividing the Word of truth". It is fine to say that you have a "whole Bible perspective" but unless you discern between the Old and New Covenant then you are a legalist. We are in a better Covenant with better promises. Please don't bring people under the Old. The scandal once again is even more scandalous when we awaken to the fact that Jesus took away the sins of the World not just the Church as you would suggest. It shocks me to hear that people would be happier if the Scripture said that He took away the sins of the Church.....but it doesn't say that does it.
Please don't hear what I didn't say. I didn't say that we received His righteousness without believing as you suggested. What I did say is that God has already punished all sin for all time in His Son who became sin for us. The only sin Christ couldn't pay for is the "sin" of unbelief. It is the sin that will take unbelievers to an eternity without God.
Wes to equate the sin of unbelief with other sins is to make a critical error in judgement. Either Christ became sin for us or He didn't. You choose. If He did then God's wrath was satisfied 2000 years ago. If He didn't then we are all in BIG trouble.
There are only 2 types of righteousness. Imputed righteousness of Christ to us by faith or unrighteousness which is all other ways to merit favor with God.
The error also that is happening here Wes is when you have an Old Covenant mindset and are not "rightly dividing the Word of truth". It is fine to say that you have a "whole Bible perspective" but unless you discern between the Old and New Covenant then you are a legalist. We are in a better Covenant with better promises. Please don't bring people under the Old. The scandal once again is even more scandalous when we awaken to the fact that Jesus took away the sins of the World not just the Church as you would suggest. It shocks me to hear that people would be happier if the Scripture said that He took away the sins of the Church.....but it doesn't say that does it.
Post a Comment